Money for postgraduate research is limited. Therefore some people think that financial support from governments should o听be provided for scientific research rather than research for less useful subjects. Do you agree or disagree?（考题重现：2009.07.04）
核心词汇：financial support from government
文章结构：辩论型片面式话题
As a common acknowledgement, postgraduate research is a central share of scientific advance.
However, the investment problem has perplexed the development for many years. There is always an announcement that the governmentshould only support the scientific ones, but not “peripheral” ones. Personally, this view is not as sensible as it sounds.
Admittedly, scientific research is important and beneficial to the whole society so the government should invest some money in this area with confidence. However, if there is only science but lack of all other subjects, nothing will be done with a conclusion.More essentially, there is no opportunity to distinguish which subject is more useful than all the others in a multicultural society.
Facing this issue, the government should cope on three levels: First, the government should collect more funds with a legal restriction or it can employ some companies to do so.More tax and financial investment will be a strong supply for the research.Second, the research laboratory should and have to use all the money efficiently and effectively. Although it is governments'obligation to support the research, the research group should never use the money for private reasons or even waste it. Lastly but themost importantly, as the government, it should not judge the value of something in a short-sighted view. Giving it more time andsupporting it even if it seems to be useless at present will show the unique perspective of the local leaders.
In conclusion, it is an inevitable obligation to invest money in doing research for college students and staff. However, thegovernment should never support the research with private and narrow-minded views.
众所周知，研究生学术课题研究是科学进步的重要组成部分。然而，投资问题多年来困扰着其发展。总有一种言论声称政府应该只支持那些科学方面的研究，而非“边缘”学科。个人觉得这种观点并没有听起来那么合理。
必须承认的是，科学研究对于整个社会非常重要并且有益，所以政府应该信心百倍投资地一部分资金在这一领域。然而，如果只投资科技而忽略其他学科，终都不会有结果。更重要的是，在多元化社会中，根本无法分辨哪些课程相对比其他更重要。
面对此问题，政府应该从三方面着手。第一，政府可以通过法律规章去收集更多的资金，或聘请一些企业去做此事。较高的税收和经济投资将会成为科研的强大支持。第二，研究所应该而且必须有效地利用所有投资。尽管政府有责任去支持研究工作，但是研究机构不能将钱用于私人目的甚至浪费。后而且为重要的是，政府不能用短浅的目光去判断某事的价值。给予研究更多的时间，并且就算目前看起来没用也应该支持，这些都体现了当地领导独具慧眼。
总之，为大学生和教研员做研究提供经济支持是政府义不容辞的责任。然而，政府不应该支持那些私人的和思想狭隘的研究。
