托福综合写作开头段写作方法

托福写作中的综合写作是中国考生较少接触的一类题型，因为这类题型是通过阅读和听力部分提供了过量的信息让考生选择其中重要内容进行复写。下面来了解一下托福综合写作开头段写作方法吧。

一，使用不定式

就是在句子的开头放上一个不定式，比如说To win，或者是写成in order to win，candidates need to convey a clear message that is not contaminatedby the opposition. 前边加了一个in order to或者是to，也可以让句子变得多样，且长度增加。

二、使用现在分词

比如说，Tapping the power of being seen, the Oscar nominees appeared onlate-night television, morning news programs, and in glossy magazines. ，现在分词tapping就可以起到让句子开头有变化的这种作用，但是注意，tapping出现ing的时候证明这个词的主语跟后面主句的主语一致，这种情况下才可以使用ing的形式来开头。同样呢，我们还可以使用过去分词做开头，但这种情况下要求后一句的主语要和前边的这个分词形成被动关系。

三、开门见山式

概括背景 + 引出话题 + 一类人观点 + 另一类人观点对比 + 个人观点

1、概括背景：以概括题目的方式给出文章的写作背景。

2、引出话题：以承上启下的方式引出题目关键词。

3、一类人观点：针对题目的两个面，先给出一类人的观点。

4、另一类人观点对比：站在一类人的对立面给出相对立的观点。

5、个人观点：在相对立的两个立场中选择一个作为自己的观点。

四、娓娓道来式

概括背景 + 引出话题 + 一类人观点 + 另一类人观点对比 + 争议句

1、概括背景：以概括题目的方式提出文章的写作背景。

2、引出话题：以承上启下的方式引出题目关键词。

3、一类人观点：针对题目的两个面，先给出一类人的观点。

4、另一类人观点对比：站在一类人的对立面给出相对立的观点。

5、争议句：给出一个争议的句子，不直接表明个人观点，将之留在“论证段”或“结尾段”进行阐述或总结。

不需要观点只要求复述

这一点相信很多人都已经知道了，那就是托福综合写作，不需要考生给出自己的观点，这篇文章的写作要求就是客观。说得简单粗暴一些，考生在这篇写作中扮演的角色并非叙述者或者辩论者，而只是一个带有信息记录筛选汇总整理功能的传声筒。

很多同学明知不需要观点，但在写作过程中还是忍不住冒出一些我认为我觉得的句子，这其实就是犯了综合写作的忌讳。所以，大家在进行托福综合写作的答题时，一定要注意保持自己的客观立场，主要能够把阅读和听力中给出的信息准确地通过行文转述表达出来，那么你的写作目的就已经达到了，这点希望大家一定要牢记在心。

不需要事无巨细

托福综合写作中的阅读和听力部分，给出的信息是过量的。也就是说，实际综合写作中，并不要求你事无巨细把所有内容都写进去。考生只需要做到successfully selects the important information from the lecutre就已经足够了，大家注意其中的important，这才是关键词。

形式随意性较强

考生无论是写成多个段落还是直接一段完事，只要内容能够清晰有条理，哪种形式其实都是可以接受的。

一、比较新颖、有创意的开头

“As technologies and the demand for certain services change， many workers will lose their jobs. The responsibility for those people to adjust to such change should belong to the individual worker， not to government or to business.

As a saying goes， “God helps those help themselves”， which is true in most cases. But as far as the large numbers of laid-off workers caused by the technological and market changes are concerned， I believe the government and the business certainly have an unshakable responsibility to take.

二、 稍作让步表达自己观点和立场

“Work greatly influences people’s personal lives—their special interests， their leisure activities， even their appearance way from the work place.”

The speaker claims that our jobs greatly influence our personal interests， recreational activities and even appearance. While I agree that the personal lives of some people are largely determined by their work， in my view it would be a mistake to draw this conclusion generally. In my observation， the extent to which occupation influences personal life depends on the nature of the work， and how central the work is to one’s sense of self.

“We shape our buildings and afterwards our buildings shape us.”

I believe this statement should be interpreted broadly—to mean that we are influenced by the exterior shape of buildings， as well as by the arrangement of multiple buildings and by a building’s various architectural and aesthetic elements. While I doubt that buildings determine our character or basic personality traits， I agree that they can greatly influence our attitudes， moods， and even life styles.

三、以提问方式开头阐述自己观点

“As technologies and the demand for certain services change， many workers will lose their jobs. The responsibility for those people to adjust to such change should belong to the individual worker， not to government or to business.”

As technology and changing social needs render more and more jobs obsolete， who is responsible for helping displaced workers adjustWhile individuals have primary responsibility for learning new skills and finding work， both industry and government have some obligation to provide them the means of doing so.

四、先表明自己立场再阐述原因

Businesses are as likely as are governments to establish large bureaucracies， but bureaucracy is far more damaging to a business than it is to a government.

Contrary to the statement’s premise， my view is that businesses are less likely than government to establish large bureaucracies， because businesses know that they are more vulnerable than government to damage resulting from bureaucratic inefficiencies. My position is well supported by common sense and by observation.