gre作文4分怎么样_gre作文4分是什么水平

新GRE满分：170+170+6，语文(Verbal)和数学(Quantitative)是170分，作文(Analytical Writing)还是6分。Verbal(词汇)与Quantitative(数学)部分为笔试，Analytical Writing(分析性写作)为机考。

所以GRE作文总分是6分，gre作文4分是一个一般的成绩。

GRE官网成绩查询作文分方便快捷，是很多考生的选择，GRE官网成绩查询办法：

第一步：进入ETS的GRE页面

第二步：点击右上角“MY GRE ACCOUNT”，注册新用户，填写本人基本信息和考试信息;

第三步：在SERVICES栏中点击view scores online，就能直接查找到自己的GRE成绩了，写作、语文和数学都有，还有要寄送成绩的学校部系等，很详细。

GRE作文究竟要追求多高的分数才足够申请名校之用呢?

1. 根据ETS官方发布的数据显示，2015年GRE中国考生的作文平均分为3.0分，这个成绩其实并不理想，哪怕是在亚洲区，也比韩国3.1和印度3.3分要低，更不用提去和欧美区的英语母语国家考生相比了。如果要想申请名校的话，3分的水平还是远远不够的。

2. 根据U.S.NEWS公布的新院校年度排名相关数据显示，TOP10的美国高级名校，对于文科专业的GRE作文平均分，最高可以达到4.5分。而TOP50的出色学校，作文平均分也至少在4分左右。

GRE作文的官方评分标准，主要集中在文章观点、整体框架、逻辑论述和词句运用这四个方面。高分范文对于这四点要求缺一不可。特别是其中的观点和逻辑这两部分，所占评分比重更为突出。新GRE则更看重考生在写作中所展现出的逻辑思维分析能力，因此，大家在写作过程中也要多加注意，让文章的逻辑论述能够更加严密有层次。GRE ISSUE/ARGUMENT作文异同点全面解析

1. 从文章结构上打动考官

首先要做到的就是让文章框架简单明了。从考官角度出发，每次GRE考试后都有海量的作文要批阅，不可能每篇作文都从头到尾一字不漏地看完，而根据欧美人士的写作习惯，往往会把每个段落的中心句放在段首等明显位置。为了迎合这种阅读和写作习惯，考生也需要尽可能把中心句所在凸显出来，同时确保逻辑论述的清晰和层次性，能够让人一目了然看出文章框架和大意，而不是藏头露尾不知所云。这样考官看得更省力，自然也会有更好的印象。

2. 从细节词句上打动考官

除了文章结构外，考生在具体的遣词造句方面，也需要有所注意。首先是长难句，很多人会觉得只有写出长难句才能体现出自己的写作功底和语言水平，其实恰恰相反。虽然ETS喜欢用长难句，但那更多是为了考察考生，而不是用来为难自己，实际上很多老外在看到长难句的时候也是非常痛恨的。同时，使用长难句还很容易出现语法错误，假如使用不当反而会暴露出自己英语底气不足的问题，正确的做法是以简单句为主，少量使用一些复杂句式进行点缀才会更符合考官的口味。

从前文看出来，gre作文4分是较理想的分数。当然，作文分数越高分越好。

ETS官网GRE作文4分范文赏析

Reader Commentary for Essay Response — Score 4

This essay meets all the criteria of a level-4 essay. The writer develops a clear position ("Using technology to solve our problems will continue to help us realize our potential as a human race"). The position is then developed with relevant reasons ("using technology to solve more complicat[ed] problems gives humans a chance to expand their thinking and learning" and "we are seeing a golden age of technology").

Point 1, "using technology," is supported with the simple but relevant notion that technology allows us access to information and abilities to which we would not normally have access. Similarly, point 2, the "golden age," is supported by the basic deion of our technologically saturated social condition. Though the overall development and organization of the essay does suffer from an occasional misdirection (see paragraph 3's abrupt progression from coffee pots to the benefits of technology to cars), the essay as a whole flows smoothly and logically from one idea to the next.

It is useful to compare this essay to the level-3 essay presented next. Though both essays entail some surface-level discussion and often fail to probe deeply into the issue, this writer does take the analysis a step further. In paragraph 2, the distinction between this essay and the next one (the level-3 response) can most clearly be seen. To support the notion that advances in technology actually help increase thinking ability, the writer draws a clever parallel between the promise of modern, sophisticated technology (computer) and the actual "impact" of equally "promising" and pervasive technologies of the past (printing press).

Like the analysis, the language in this essay clearly meets the requirements for a score of 4. The writer displays sufficient control of language and the conventions of standard written English. The preponderance of mistakes are of a cosmetic nature ("trying to solve more complicating problems.") There is a sentence fragment ("Going off ...") along with a comma splice ("Our ability ... isn't deteriorating, it's continuing to grow ...") in paragraph 3. However, these errors are minor and do not interfere with the clarity of the ideas being presented.